Peer Review Statement
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract All papers published in this volume have been reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted expert referees to professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal IOP Publishing. • Type peer review: Single Anonymous Conference submission management system: Morressier Number submissions received: 60 sent for 50 accepted: 31 Acceptance Rate (Submissions Accepted / Submissions Received × 100): 51.7 Average number reviews per paper: 2 Total reviewers involved: Contact person queries: Name: Lu Yingfa Email: [email protected] Affiliation: Hubei University Technology, China
منابع مشابه
the impact of peer review on efl reviewers writing proficiency
امروزه تصحیح همکلاسی در کلاسهای نگارش یکی از اجزاء لاینفک کلاسهای دانش آموز محور است. تاثیرات مفید تصحیح همکلاسی بر زبان آموزان، معلمان را متقاعد کرده است که علیرغم صرف زمان، انرژی و توان بسیار، از این شیوه ی آموزشی در کلاسهای آموزش نگارش بهره بگیرند. تحقیق حاضر بر آن است تا با مقایسه دو گروه از یادگیرندگان زبان انگلیسی، تاثیر تصحیح همکلاسی را بر توانایی نوشتاری آنها نشان دهد. 122 خانم زبان آمو...
15 صفحه اولA Review on the Editorial Peer Review
Background and Objectives: The editorial peer review has an important role in the publication of scientific articles. Peers or reviewers are those scholars who have the expertise regarding the topic of a given article. They critically appraise the articles without having any monetary incentives or conflicts of interest. The aim of this study was to determine the most important aspects of the ed...
متن کاملPublisher's Copyright Statement: Use Policy Educational Research, Peer Review and Editor Engagement *
Peer review of research articles is known to have shortcomings in a variety of disciplines. Many of these shortcomings are explained by reference to situational, psychological, sociological and ethical influences on reviewers’ behaviour. Ways of combating these shortcomings have been proposed, usually aimed at the reviewer. Given that reviewing is voluntary, these proposals tend to be unrealist...
متن کاملPeer Review Practices for Evaluating Biomedical Research Grants: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
The biomedical research enterprise depends on the fair and objective peer review of research grants, leading to the distribution of resources through efficient and robust competitive methods. In the United States, federal funding agencies and foundations collectively distribute billions of dollars annually to support biomedical research. For the American Heart Association, a Peer Review Subcomm...
متن کاملReviewing Peer Review: a Quantitative Analysis of Peer Review
In this paper we focus on the analysis of peer reviews and reviewers behavior in a number of different review processes. More specifically, we report on the development, definition and rationale of a theoretical model for peer review processes to support the identification of appropriate metrics to assess the processes main properties. We then apply the proposed model and analysis framework to ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Physics: Conference Series
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1742-6588', '1742-6596']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2186/1/011002